Posts

flatline_shutterstock_166551869 800x315

Cap rates for the single-tenant net-lease sector increased for the eighth consecutive quarter in Q1 2024, jumping to an average of 6.64% across all major asset types.

STNL asking cap rates for office properties hit 7.6% in Q1, followed by industrial, which averaged 7.02%, and retail, which jumped to 6.42%, according to the latest market report from The Boulder Group.

According to The Boulder Group’s Jimmy Goodman, the current cycle of STNL cap rate increases is the longest since 2014. In an interview at GlobeSt.’s Net Lease conference in NYC this week, Goodman said STNL cap rates will remain elevated until the Fed starts cutting interest rates.

“I think we’re at status quo, this is the new normal until the Fed moves to cut rates,” Goodman said. “Everyone had this level of hope last year that we would have rate cuts this year, but 2024 is looking a lot like 2023.”

“Now, people are hoping for a rate cut in Q3, but it probably won’t be a large cut,” he added. “Until then, nothing will change. Cap rates will increase or plateau. I don’t see them decreasing any time soon.”

The new status quo also is likely to keep transaction volume at a minimum — one description we heard is “flatlining” — as buyers are few and far between and sellers refuse to reprice their deals to higher cap rates.

Most of the players in the STNL market are in it for the long-term, typically with 10- or 20-year leases, and they can wait out the down cycle, Goodman noted.

“It’s a steady cash flow. The lenders, the equity, they know they’re going to get a check from the tenant,” he said. “If a $2M Starbucks just got built, it’s got a 10-year lease and they know they’re going to get paid.”

Sellers are still in denial about bringing their pricing in line with the new status quo on cap rates, Goodman suggested.

“If you’re a developer, you still want to make money off your merchant developer deals. The public REITs and people that are subject to financing can’t pay the cap rates the developer wants, and the developer doesn’t want to be upside down,” he said.

“Everyone is staring at each other and nobody is blinking,” Goodman added.

 

Source:  GlobeSt.

10-year-treasury-yields 800x315

In the latter half of last week, yields on Treasury 10-years jumped, hitting 4.55% on Wednesday, moving to 4.56% on Thursday, and dropping down to 4.50% on Friday. By the end of Monday, it was 4.63%

If you ignore 2023 when rising interest rates had a heavy impact on Treasury yields, the last time the 10-year was in this range was in the fall of 2007, as the initial rumblings of what would become the Global Financial Crisis.

Markets are not seeing the trembling of an out-of-control housing market and the derivatives built on top of it. But the current shakings might be worse.

“A series of weak auctions for U.S. Treasurys are stoking investors’ concerns that markets will struggle to absorb an incoming rush of government debt,” the Wall Street Journal reported. “A selloff sparked by a hotter-than-expected inflation report intensified this past week after lackluster demand for a $39 billion sale of 10-year Treasurys. Investors also showed tepid interest in auctions for three-year and 30-year Treasurys.”

The worry among investors is that if inflation doesn’t continue to sink, the Federal Reserve will keep interest rates where they are now rather than start cutting as investors have wanted. Or maybe increase rates if they decide it’s necessary to break the back of rising prices.

May will bring another $386 billion in bond sales, and, as the Journal notes, this will continue no matter who is elected president in November. The first quarter of 2024 saw the Treasury sell $7.2 trillion in debt. Last year, the government issued $23 trillion in Treasurys, “which raised $2.4 trillion of cash, after accounting for maturing bonds.” But a number of Treasury auctions did more poorly than expected. The Treasury Department decided to push short-term instruments as the Fed encouraged the idea that eventually they would cut interest rates. That would make higher-rate Treasurys more valuable in a presumed near term.

With inflation started to strengthen again, that strategy becomes less appealing to buyers. Also, the Fed has said it will slow quantitative tightening, which is how it reduces its balance sheet holdings of Treasury instruments. Tightening expects that investors would buy more debt. As the Fed reduces tightening, the government might lower its expectations of how much investors needed to buy.

From a CRE perspective, the more debt on sale, the greater degree that circumstances invoke the law of supply and demand. Prices will likely drop to get enough investor purchases, which would send yields up as the two aspects move inversely. The 10-year yield is one of the standard baseline rates used in CRE lending. The other, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, is strongly correlated to the 10-year, though often with a timing gap.

If baseline rates go up, so do borrowing costs, which is the big problem faced by many with maturing loans and who need refinancing but who based their business case on low interest rates and high leverage that are no longer available.

And then there is the psychological factor. All investors, whether individuals, organizations, or sovereign states, are under the thumb of human emotion. The more risk they perceive, the more skittish they are as buyers, which could push down Treasury prices even more, driving up expected yield and negatively affecting CRE.

 

Source:  GlobeSt.

increase_hundred dollar bills and upward arrow_canstockphoto68520119 800x315

Wednesday’s Consumer Price Index numbers were higher than expected, sending Wall Street into a swoon about what it could mean.

For starters, it’s just about a given that, following this latest evidence that prices are not declining as fast as had been expected, the Fed will delay implementing its promised rate cuts. But some prominent voices are wondering about a worse case scenario: that the Fed might actually start raising rates. If this were to come to pass, simply put it would raise havoc in commercial real estate. GlobeSt.com has heard repeatedly over the last few months that transactions were resuming in part because the market believed that the Fed was done raising rates, introducing some much-needed certainty into forecasts.

Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers is one of these voices.

“You have to take seriously the possibility that the next rate move will be upwards rather than downwards,” Summers said on Bloomberg Television. He said such a likelihood is somewhere in the 15% to 25% range.

The odds still do favor a Fed rate cut this year, “but not as much as is priced into markets,” he said.

Also, Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman said earlier this month that it’s possible interest rates may have to move higher to control inflation.

“While it is not my baseline outlook, I continue to see the risk that at a future meeting we may need to increase the policy rate further should progress on inflation stall or even reverse,” she said in a recent speech to the Shadow Open Market Committee in New York.  “Reducing our policy rate too soon or too quickly could result in a rebound in inflation, requiring further future policy rate increases to return inflation to 2 percent over the longer run.”

Bowman is a permanent voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has also floated the possibility that rates could increase in his letter to shareholders. The investment bank is  preparing “for a very broad range of interest rates, from 2% to 8% or even more,” he wrote.

These voices, though, are in the minority. Right now, most analysts have coalesced around the theory that rate cuts will be delayed this year.

Less than 24 hours after the CPI was released, Wall Street economists began revising their outlooks. Goldman Sachs and UBS now see two cuts starting in July and September, respectively, while analysts at Barclays anticipate just one reduction, in September, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Others are even more pessimistic about the timing.

“The lack of moderation in inflation will undermine Fed officials’ confidence that inflation is on a sustainable course back to 2% and likely delays rate cuts to September at the earliest and could push off rate reductions to next year,” Kathy Bostjancic, chief economist at Nationwide, said in a research note that was reported by The Associated Press.

Right now the Fed’s official expectation is that inflation continues to move down albeit in an uneven trajectory. If this is true, then rate cuts are still likely this year.

However, Wall Street worries that inflation has stalled at a level closer to 3% and if the evidence bears this out in future reports, it is conceivable that the Fed could scrap cuts altogether.

One indicator that does not bode well for rate cuts this year is the so-called supercore inflation reading, which besides excluding the volatile food and energy prices that the core CPI does, also strips out shelter and rent costs from its services reading.

Supercore accelerated to a 4.8% pace year over year in March, the highest in 11 months, according to CNBC.

Tom Fitzpatrick, managing director of global market insights at R.J. O’Brien & Associates, told the publication that if you take the readings of the last three months and annualize them, the supercore inflation rate is more than 8%.

All this said, the Fed has promised it would cut rates three times this year and that is a hard promise to unwind. The upheaval a rate hike would cause would give the institution a black eye even worse than its promises a few years ago that the creeping inflation in the economy was transitory.

 

Source:  GlobeSt.

stagflation_shutterstock_2176415931 800x315

A drumbeat for stagflation as a possible scenario for the US economy is growing louder.

Last week, strategists from the Bank of America wrote that the macroeconomic picture is “flipping from goldilocks to stagflation,” which they defined as growth below 2% and inflation of between 3% and 4%. Inflation is higher in developed and emerging markets, while the US labor market is “finally cracking,” wrote Michael Hartnett.

JPMorgan Chase’s Marko Kolanovic raised similar concerns in February. A halt in inflation’s downward trend, or price pressures broadly resurfacing “wouldn’t be a surprise” given outsized gains in equities, tight labor markets and high immigration and government spending, he said, according to Bloomberg.

Between 1967 to 1980, stock returns were nearly flat in nominal terms as inflation came in waves, with fixed-income investments significantly outperforming while stock returns were nearly flat in nominal terms. Kolanovic sees “many similarities to the current times.”

“We already had one wave of inflation, and questions started to appear whether a second wave can be avoided if policies and geopolitical developments stay on this course,” he said in his note, adding that inflation is likely to be harder to control as stock and cryptocurrency markets add trillions of dollars in paper wealth and quantitative tightening is offset by Treasury issuance.

Recent economic reports back up these analysts: The February Consumer Price Index came in at a higher-than-expected 3.2% year over year. Retail sales reported on Friday rose 0.6% from January to February, falling short of projections expecting 0.8% growth.

The Wall Street Journal highlighted these developments but ultimately dismissed the idea of stagflation taking hold in the US economy. So have the equity markets,

Barclays Plc strategist Emmanuel Cau wrote in a note that was reported in Bloomberg.

“With the Fed so far endorsing current market pricing of three cuts starting in June, investors continue to see the glass half full on the soft landing narrative,” he said.

This week the Federal Open Market Committee will meet and the minutes it releases will show how Fed officials’ thinking changed from recent bad data on inflation.

One sign doesn’t bode well for Fed watchers hoping for rate cuts to happen sooner than later.

More than two-thirds of academic economists polled by the Financial Times believe that the Federal Reserve will be forced to hold interest rates at a high level for longer than markets and central bankers anticipate. Respondents to the FT-Chicago Booth poll think the Fed will make two or fewer cuts this year with the most popular response for the timing of the first cut split between July and September.

“The Fed really wants to cut rates. All of the body language is about cutting. But the data is going to make it harder for them to do it,” Jason Furman, an economist at Harvard University, who was one of 38 respondents polled this month, told the FT. “I expect the last mile of inflation to prove quite stubborn.”

However, there is one viable theory for rates in June. Vincent Reinhart, a former Fed official who is now chief economist at Dreyfus and Mellon, told the FT that politics will play a role in the timing this year.

“The data say the best time to cut rates is September, but the politics say June,” said Reinhart, who did not participate in the poll. “You don’t want to start cuts that close to an election.”

 

Source:  GlobeSt.

interest rates_canstockphoto9302196

It’s “unlikely” that market interest rates will return to levels before the pandemic, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said to reporters yesterday in comments that were published by Bloomberg.

A reporter asked Yellen why the White House projections that were part of President Joe Biden’s $7.3 trillion fiscal 2025 budget proposal showed higher expectations for interest rates in coming years compared with projections a year ago. Yellen said the new numbers were in line with private sector forecasts.

“I think it reflects current market realities and the forecasts that we’re seeing in the private sector — that it seems unlikely that yields are going to go back to being as low as they were before the pandemic,” she said.

The budget proposal now assumes that the rates on three-month US Treasury bills will average 5.1% this year, up from the 3.8% projected last March. The projection for the 10-year yield is now 4.4%, up from 3.6%.

Meanwhile, some economists are beginning to think that it will be a long time for the Fed to reach its goal of 2% inflation and that 3% will be the new normal.

“Inflation was able to decelerate from 9% to 3% rather quickly, but the path to the Fed’s 2% target may take more time than expected,” Skyler Weinand, CIO of Regan Capital, told Axios.

Last week, the Labor Department reported that the Consumer Price Index grew 3.2%year over year.

Lara Rhame, chief U.S. economist at FS Investments, also believes that inflation will hover at 3% for the foreseeable future.

The Fed is “going to err on the side of caution in terms of cutting too quickly,” Rhame said to Axios.

 

Source:  GlobeSt.

interest rates 800x315

There seems to be hope abounding in commercial real estate, according to the Federal Reserve’s Beige Book. Optimism tends to look toward the future — in this case, when the industry hopes interest rates will drop.

In the reality of the moment, though, that hasn’t changed how higher rates are still limiting real estate deals, as reported by the various Federal Reserve district banks and what they’re hearing from people in their multi-state regions. And the optimism may ultimately end, as the excitement over interest rate reductions may be premature.

Consider the following excerpts from the report.

Boston: “Commercial real estate activity weakened further modestly, and the outlook in that sector remained mostly pessimistic, despite expected declines in borrowing rates. In the already-weak office market, vacancy rates increased moderately on average, and Providence in particular saw the exit of a large downtown tenant. Office rents fell noticeably in the Boston area in recent months but were reportedly stable (if low) elsewhere. Demand for life sciences space in greater Boston dwindled further to very low levels. In the retail market, rents and vacancy rates were mostly steady at moderate levels, although lower-end malls continued to see elevated vacancies. Demand for industrial space slowed further at a modest pace, but rents and occupancy rates were described as mostly stable at healthy levels. Projections for commercial real estate activity in 2024 were mixed but remained pessimistic on balance.”

New York: “Commercial real estate markets mostly held steady. New York City office vacancy rates were steady near historic highs and rents declined slightly. Upstate New York office markets saw continued increases in vacancy rates, but rents were unchanged. In the industrial market, small improvements were seen in downstate New York while conditions in upstate New York deteriorated. Construction contacts reported that activity declined modestly since the last report. Office construction dropped, but industrial construction grew with high volumes under construction and significant deliveries set for 2024 in downstate New York and northern New Jersey.”

Philadelphia: “In nonresidential markets, leasing activity and transaction volumes continued to decline slightly—more so in the office market in which existing tenants continued to downsize their space and upgrade their quality as their leases expired. In contrast, current construction activity held steady, although many contacts expect that the project pipeline will shrink before the end of 2024. New projects are slowly emerging in heavy industry and infrastructure.” However, banks in the region generally noticed modest growth in CRE loan volumes.

Cleveland: “Residential construction and real estate contacts reported that activity remained soft in recent weeks. However, one homebuilder reported an increase in inquiries as mortgage rates declined. Nonresidential construction rebounded in recent weeks. One commercial builder noted that declining interest rates and greater optimism about the economic outlook had boosted demand. Moreover, multiple general contractors reported that customers had elected to move forward with previously delayed projects. Commercial real estate and construction contacts expected demand to remain mostly stable in the near term.”

Richmond: “Overall market activity in commercial real estate was flat this period. Retail remained strong, especially with fast casual restaurant chains. In the office sector, Class A office space was tightening with more leasing activity related to firms upgrading their space and moving away from central business districts. A lack of available financing continued to constrain new development and refinancing within the broader CRE sector. Construction projects were mainly limited to the industrial and multifamily segments. Contractors noted that due to the high cost of construction there were few new CRE projects and, as such, their backlog of work was shrinking.”

Atlanta: “The Sixth District’s office market continued to encounter negative absorption rates and diminishing occupancies. Leasing activity at the end of 2023 dropped to 2020 levels, creating a ‘tenant’s market,’ where landlords were forced to offer incentives. Market conditions are expected to remain challenged in 2024 as new construction is delivered. Other property segments experienced weakening conditions as well; contacts in industrial markets reported that the amount of square feet in the pipeline is running well ahead of absorption, resulting in higher vacancy levels. Contacts expressed concerns over rising commercial real estate loan maturities in 2024.”

Chicago: “Construction and real estate activity was little changed on balance over the reporting period. Nonresidential construction activity increased slightly, while prices were unchanged. One auto dealership group said that the expectation interest rates would begin falling soon was a factor in their proceeding with a project to increase service-center capacity. Commercial real estate activity was unchanged. Demand for industrial properties remained at elevated levels. While prices fell slightly, rents, vacancy rates and the availability of sublease space were all unchanged.”

St. Louis: “Commercial real estate rental markets continue to be stagnant in the office sector for downtown areas. Contacts reported continued commercial real estate sales in Northwest Arkansas, including two large multi-family units and a couple of retail sales. A large multi-family community is expected to start construction in Northwest Arkansas in early 2024.”

Minneapolis: “Construction activity was lower overall since the last report. Among roughly two dozen construction contacts, recent sales were lower and profits have been particularly hard hit. Recent hiring demand has fallen somewhat, but sentiment was modestly more positive for the early part of 2024. Among sectors, firms in infrastructure continued to fare better thanks to federal spending. November and December commercial permitting was generally flat or lower in the District’s larger markets compared with a year earlier. Residential building was constrained in many markets, but single-family permitting in Minneapolis-St. Paul saw sustained increases for several months, including December. Commercial real estate was flat overall. Vacancy rates for industrial space have ticked higher thanks to significant speculative building in the last year. Office markets remained soft, and reports of tenant concessions were rising. Retail vacancy has improved modestly thanks to stronger foot-traffic trends and lower levels of new construction.”

Kansas City: “Contacts indicated transaction activity for commercial properties was suppressed in recent weeks. Potential buyers of many office properties, and some multifamily properties, were reportedly waiting for a bottom as loans are set to be repriced over the medium term. Those buyers not waiting on the sidelines were reportedly pricing to a bottom among distressed sellers, resulting in large spreads between bid prices and ask prices that made price discovery difficult in most markets. Some contacts suggested that transaction activity may pick up slightly in coming months as appetites for restructuring loans may increase after year end. Yet, falling rents and rising insurance costs adversely affecting net operating incomes remained widely cited concerns inhibiting loan restructuring when desired.”

Dallas: “Activity in commercial real estate was little changed. Apartment leasing picked up slightly though rents remained flat. Office leasing remained weak; vacancy rates were elevated, and concessions remained widespread. Industrial vacancy rates rose as new supply continued to outpace demand. Macroeconomic uncertainty, high capital costs, and reduced appetite to lend continued to deter investment sales and construction starts across property types.”

San Francisco: “Conditions in the commercial real estate market were mixed. While demand for retail and industrial space was solid, office leasing activity remained weak. Transaction volumes of commercial property sales were down as sellers’ asking prices exceeded what buyers were willing to pay. Construction activity reportedly slowed for private-sector commercial projects due to financing constraints, while construction of government public and infrastructure projects expanded. Challenges obtaining some materials, particularly electrical equipment, persisted.”

 

Source:  GlobeSt.

interest rates_canstockphoto9302196

Listening to discussions about what will happen with interest rates in 2024 is like walking into an open house at The Oxford Union of the namesake university. Debates to the right and left with the audience voting on the most compelling argument.

One of the loudest collective voices in the rate debate are the money markets, and they’re nowhere near as optimistic as those cheering a soft landing of the country’s economic airplane, according to Reuters. Financial markets are expecting interest rates to remain high for an extended period of time — 3% for years — with inflation still higher than the Fed wants and government spending driving new heights of public debt.

The former means the Fed could limit cuts and the latter will mean more U.S. borrowing at higher yields to attract buyers. The yields, especially for the 10-year, create an attractive place for investors to put money with relative safety, boosting the rates other outlets must get to provide risk-adjusted returns and compete as investment opportunities. In other words, don’t expect the decade of near-zero rates to return.

“Traders have in recent weeks doubled down on bets for steep rate cuts next year, encouraged by slowing inflation and a dovish shift from the U.S. Federal Reserve,” Reuters wrote. “Expectations that rates will drop at least 1.5 percentage points in the United States and Europe have boosted bond and equity markets.”

The Federal Reserve’s most recent collection of economic expectations show the projected federal funds rate range to be 4.4% to 4.9% this year, 3.1% to 3.9% next year, 2.5% to 3.1% in 2026, and 2.5% to 3.0% in the longer run.

The warnings aren’t coming only from money markets. There have been polar takes on the edge.

As Stephen Stanley, chief US economist at Santander, told the Financial Times, “You couldn’t draw up a more perfect economic scenario than the FOMC’s forecasts. If it happens, that would be tremendous. But there are only downside risks.”

As Jeffrey Gundlach — founder, CEO, and chief investment officer of Doubleline, and money management firm that is a big player in the bond market — told CNBC in an interview that when the yield level of the 10-year Treasury market goes below 4%, it sounds “almost like a fire alarm.” And the 10-year has been hovering under 4% since mid-December. If Gundlach is right and lower 10-year yields are portents of a recession next year, the Feds might raise interest rates as a way to drive down price hikes.

In other words, near-zero interest rates may be long out of play no matter how you look at current conditions.

 

Source:  GlobeSt.

bow of a boat on the water_shutterstock_312520301 800x315

It’s going to be tough for apartment operators to maintain occupancies in a slowing economy, although property fundamentals should hold up in 2024 among a few challenges, according to a new report from Yardi Matrix.

Among the challenges are the wave of deliveries, limiting expense growth, rising mortgage rates, and dealing with more expensive and less liquid capital markets.

“We are no longer in a rising-tide lifts-all-boats market,” Yardi Matrix said.

“The traditional property acquisition pipeline will likely remain stalled through most of the year, so near-term opportunities will be concentrated in debt investments and providing capital for property restructurings.”

One big and growing issue will be maturity defaults as loans come due and properties qualify for proceeds that are less than the existing mortgages, according to the report.

On the other hand, the challenges are not insurmountable for owners with a long-term perspective, but they will take skill and expertise to navigate, according to the report.

The higher-for-longer interest rate scenario will bring a market reset with higher acquisition yields, higher financing costs, and lower leverage and values.

“We expect rent growth will be positive in 2024 but diminished by slowing absorption, supply growth, and declining affordability after extraordinary gains in 2021-22,” Yardi Matrix said.

It said rent growth will be found in the Midwest, Northeast, and smaller Southern and Mountain areas where demand remains consistent, and deliveries are subdued.

Strong demand and weak supply growth in markets like New York and Chicago should lead to strong recoveries while the Sun Belt and West markets will see a temporary pause in rent increases. The long-term prospects there remain bullish, however.

The rise in construction financing is putting a lid on new starts and 2024 is expected to be a peak year for deliveries.

Insurance labor, materials, and maintenance will continue to take a bite out of budgets.

Yardi Matrix believes that activity is likely to remain weak in 2024 “but could rebound later in the year if rate hikes have ended.”

It’s not just that property values are down, but that buyers and sellers can’t agree on how much.

Meanwhile, lenders will continue to be cautious, and borrowers are reluctant to lock in loans at high rates, according to the report.

 

Source:  GlobeSt.

papers with question marks on wood surface-shutterstock_264466154 800x315

Commercial real estate professionals agreed in the Fall of 2022 that 2023 would have a healthy serving of uncertainty, with falling transaction volumes leading to a lack of price discovery and rising interest rates putting pressure on financing.

Still, people thought that by the second quarter of 2023, things would be getting back to normal. No one had a clue how long inflation would hang in, how high interest rates would go, and how much macroeconomic trouble there would be with banks being closed, many lenders pulling back, falling valuations, the ongoing impact of higher interest rates, major strikes by unions, political division, and more.

CRE pros are being much more careful and circumspect now.

As Jeff Klotz, founder and CEO of The Klotz Group of Companies, says, “The only certainty we’ve added is that it’s more uncertain.”

Welcome to the future. Here’s what industry insiders are thinking might happen this year in key areas.

PRICE DISCOVERY AND VALUATIONS

With all other problems, discovery of many types is maybe the biggest, because it holds important answers, if only that discovery gets to happen.

“For the next 12 months, the theme will be a discovery of the result of all the mistakes made over the last several years,” Klotz says. On the transaction level, he thinks that “the divide between buyer and seller is larger and wider today,” and “it hasn’t shrunk as we had expected at this time last year,” Klotz says. His company buys, sells, owns, operates, consults, borrows, lends, and develops with 12 different wholly owned subsidiaries.

Klotz gets excited over the potential for buying “some discounted and cheap real estate.” His big worry is his own portfolio.

“Let’s face it, I can’t control the market. I can’t control what it’s worth because the market does that.”

PRIVATE MARKETS HAVE YET TO PRICE IN CHANGES

Going hand-in-hand with a lack of price discovery is the opacity and potential over-valuation of private real estate values.

“The public REIT markets have already priced in the impact of higher debt caps and are trading at the 6% cap rate,” says Uma Moriarity, senior investment strategist and global ESG lead for CenterSquare. “For core private real estate funds, we look at the NCREIF ODCE Index. The valuation across those funds is still close to a 4.2% cap rate. If you don’t have transactions, you don’t have comps and you don’t have the right data feed appraisers need. In terms of the 4.2 cap rate, those ODCE funds are doing transactions in the 5% cap range. We think the public REITs are on the slightly cheap side of fair because the private market is still overpriced.”

According to research from CenterSquare Investment Management, REITs historically outperform private real estate and equities in the periods of time after rate hiking cycles end. If the Fed does stop the upward march of its rate hiking cycle, 2024 could see REIT outperformance.

INTEREST RATES

If there is any single number that is a meaningful metric for the industry, it’s the federal funds rate, the benchmark interest set by the Federal Reserve, with its enormous impact on financing costs.

“I think you could argue very convincingly that the 30-year bull run is over,” Nancy Lashine, managing partner of Park Madison Partners, says. “I don’t think I’m ever going to see a 2% Treasury rate again. I don’t think we’ll ever see a 3% or 4% mortgage rate again. You could argue there’s no good deal. There’s plenty of capital but no good deal.”

 

“I would say we’ve enjoyed cheap money for a very long time, but it’s led us to a lot of pricing perhaps that was reliant on that cheap financing,” says Tess Gruenstein, senior vice president, acquisitions and portfolio management, real estate at Bailard. “When it goes away, things shift. We’re back to a more normalized environment and people won’t do deals because they’re optimized for leverage.”

That means a lot of real estate — and not just office — is going to be underwater.

“We have a lot of groups coming to us because we raise private equity capital. The best thing anybody can say to us is we have no legacy assets,” says Lashine. “If you were in this business over the last 15 years and you heard someone say, ‘I sold everything in 2005, 2006, and 2007,’ not only is he a good operator, but he has good timing. That was the best story anyone could tell and you’re going to hear those stories again.”

LENDERS PULL BACK

“This is kind of a doom and gloom moment,” says Stephen Bittel, chairman and CEO of Terranova Corporation. “The real challenge is that, whether they admit it or not, most banks are pretty much out of the lending business. There are a handful that will continue to dip their toes in the water for best customers with good equity and balance sheets.”

Many banks are worried about depositors seeing some assets, whether long-term Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities, or CRE-backed loans, as suspect, as happened with bank closings in 2023. Depositors pulled their money. For the first time, bank deposits contracted, by 4.8%, in the first half of 2023. Banks are worried that CRE loan values could drop in the face of falling property valuations, cutting asset values and making it harder to cover further worried withdrawals.

“If the small and mid-sized banks stop lending, which they effectively have — they’re pushing deals with high rates — businesses will shrink and cause a recession,” Bittel adds. “Banks are nervous about the future because it’s uncertain.”

 

Adam Fishkind, a member of law firm Dykema Gossett, says his “loan origination practice has definitely fallen off a cliff” — not just with banks, but other sources. “When I do borrower representation, I don’t see a lot of CMBS deals coming through these days.

“A lot of that has been replaced by private equity lending” with “the overall loan transaction is more akin to hard money lending.” Rates are higher and generally include points on the front and back ends, with larger spreads, shorter terms, and higher interest rate floors.

 

“Our expectations is that we’re not going to see an early improvement in 2024,” says David Cocanougher, president of multifamily at Leon Multifamily, part of Leon Capital Group. “I think there’s a tendency to want to be optimistic, but the longer this continues, the more down to earth everybody becomes.”

OFFICE SPECIAL SERVICING AND DEFAULTS

Ongoing data from multiple sources have shown that defaults, workouts, and special servicing are all on the rise, especially for office.

“We’re seeing some large office product defaults in the CMBS special servicing stuff that I do,” says Fishkind. “A lot of these buildings, they have a couple of major tenants that have left. If you have an A property and a great location, you probably still have a pretty good asset. But if you have suburban office or older office, you might have trouble again. It’s one of those opportunities where people are probably reducing space and putting the money in their pocket because they’re nervous about the possible recession, or they’re reducing space and going to a better environment.”

 

DISTRESS

“There are more distressed situations and transactions happening because of the way projects were structured because of floating rate debt or even pressure from equity partners to get a faster exit,” Cocanougher says.

 

“A lot of people say things because they want to move the market,” Jason Aster, vice president at KBA Lease Services, says. “The truth of the matter is my business exclusively relies on tenants taking office, but other than highly liquid companies poised to take advantage of distress, I don’t see anyone jumping in to invest in office assets, or any commercial assets.”

GlobeSt.com has previously reported signs of a secret distress market — increased bank CRE charge-offs and higher levels of distressed CRE loans — largely being handled privately and that has not broken out into a fully obvious run on distressed properties.

“What you’re seeing in leases is a focus on how a landlord or owner could apportion reinvestment,” Cocanougher adds. “What you’re seeing in leases are ways for the landlord to take back space originally designed for tenants, but then” charge back the costs or possibly even the lost rents. “While super high quality, trophy office assets will be fully booked and retain their value, landlords will hand the keys of distressed assets back to the lenders at a greater frequency in 2024. This will be particularly prevalent in the older Class A and Class B office product in dense cities like NYC and San Francisco.”

Klotz refers to the current distressed market as “private” and “embarrassing.” No one wants to talk about it publicly because they don’t want to draw attention to having made a mistake and losing money. Or, on the other hand, they don’t want others to realize that they bought some distressed properties and got a good deal. And the data lags because these events are in real time.

But it’s also attractive. “If you’re a core buyer, you can look around and say, ‘Would I take a 7% interest rate on a core investment?’ I think so,” Gruenstein says. “If you have a long-term perspective and patient capital, it’s very easy to make a case that now is the time to be out in the market, picking up some of these great pieces of real estate.”

Many with capital in their back pockets may still be waiting, though.

“I think there’s possibly a lot of equity being kept out,” says Tere Blanca, chairman and CEO of Blanca Commercial Real Estate. “It’s eroding if you had any, with values being hit as much as they have been. You wake up to higher interest rates and to much higher costs of operating your property and values are getting impacted. It’s a difficult time to navigate.”

 

“We’re still being patient, for sure, especially when it comes to investing in hard assets,” says Matt Windisch, executive vice president at Kennedy Wilson, which bought PacWest’s CRE loan portfolio for $2.4 billion back in June. “We continue to think that the construction lending space is extremely interesting. We have committed capital partners to fund an expansion.”

CONSUMERS PULL BACK

While consumer spending has appeared to continue strongly, it may not be all it seems. When the Census Bureau reports on consumer spending, it doesn’t take price differences into account. In other words, these are nominal and not real changes in spending behavior. To top it, the changes in spending are to only a 90% confidence interval that generally includes zero, so there is no way to tell if there’s been an actual change.

“I think part of why the pickup in transaction volumes didn’t happen this year is the Fed kept raising rates,” says Moriarty.

The translation from monetary strategy to the rest of the economy isn’t working as it has in the past.

Moriarty says she’s seen a rolling recession across the economy, but that it hasn’t hit the consumer. “That lasted a lot longer than any of us anticipated,” she says. “If you listen to what we saw from a lot of the consumer-oriented earnings this past earnings season, listening to what the hospitality REITs were telling you or the apartment REITs were telling you, you were seeing a pullback from the consumers.”

Credit card debt is at an all-time high and credit card and auto loan delinquencies are on the rise.

“The other new big thing to watch relates to student debt payments coming back online,” she adds “It seems difficult with the lack of credit availability overall to see that level of tightening without an impact.”

Consumers had built-up liquidity from Covid, but estimates, including from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, suggest that is likely gone. Not what you want to see when you’re hoping to avoid a recession, but consumer spending is 68% of GDP.

 

Source:  GlobeSt.

alternatives_choices_shutterstock_131772284 800x315

By Ron Osborne, Managing Director, Sperry Commercial Global Affiliates | RJ Realty

 

As a financing method, a sale-leaseback holds more advantages for businesses compared to leveraging their balance sheets. With today’s escalated interest rates, a scenario has emerged where the sale-leaseback option outweighs borrowing avenues for companies. If a business’s borrowing rate for a leaseback (or cap rate) is significantly lower than its corporate borrowing rate, redirecting equity tied up in a building becomes a viable alternative, particularly for business expansion.

Often, businesses encounter opportunities to broaden their reach or enhance their current facilities. Capitalizing on these prospects sometimes demands more funds than readily available. In such cases, selling the property, unlocking the tied-up equity, and reinvesting it into business expansion or improvements becomes a more cost-effective solution than traditional borrowing options.

Consider this: if the borrowing rate stands at 9% to 10%, but the business can sell and lease back the property at 6% to 7%, there exists a substantial 200 to 300 basis point spread. Undoubtedly, this presents a far more advantageous financing route than leveraging the balance sheet.

This strategy empowers the company to retain control over the asset by becoming a tenant for a specified duration—a 5-year, 10-year, 15-year term, or as outlined in the agreement.  Sometime the buyer will give the ownership the First Right of Refusal or Option to buy back the property at some future time and price.

Sale-leasebacks have served companies, regardless of their size, for numerous years, facilitating business expansion, debt reduction, or other alternative uses made possible by the equity in their properties. They’re  an excellent method for companies to unlock dormant equity and channel it toward paying off debts, acting as a debt substitute, or funding crucial business-related upgrades.

Given the recent substantial rise in interest rates over the past couple of years, businesses eyeing property purchases or refinancing endeavors to expand could view a sale-leaseback as a viable alternative to an SBA loan.